Legal Opinion

State v. Peek

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 8726SC637PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing into evidence copies of several pieces of mail addressed to her at 826 Squirrel Hill Road. Because they were offered to prove that she lived at that address, defendant contends the mail is inadmissible hearsay. We disagree.

Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declar-ant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Livermon v. Bridgett, 77 N.C. App. 533, 335 S.E. 2d 753 (1985), disc. rev. denied, 315 N.C. 391, 338 S.E. 2d 880 (1986); G.S. 8C-1, Rule 801(c). A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Martin v. HareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. RasorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. MinorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Lamont Carpenter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API