State v. Rasor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
For the reasons stated below, we find defendant’s assignments of error to be meritless and hold that he received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the evidence presented at trial tended to show the following: Defendant, aged sixteen, and Roger Giles, aged fifteen, were juvenile offenders committed to the Juvenile Evaluation Center in Swannanoa. On 19 March 1984, defendant and Giles escaped from the center. They spent that night and most of the next day in hiding but resolved that they would make it home without recapture,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.