Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bilodeau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 2010No. 2008-443Published

1DissentBroderick, C.J.

Because I disagree, based upon the evidence presented, that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s confession was voluntary, I respectfully dissent.

The New Hampshire Constitution provides in part that “[n]o subject shall be ... compelled to accuse or furnish evidence against himself.” N.H. CONST, pt. I, art. 15. Part I, Article 15 guarantees every citizen due process of the law. State v. Damiano, 124 N.H. 742, 746 (1984). Because “a defendant’s constitutional guarantees of due process may not be violated without the involvement of a State actor,” State v. Nickerson,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API