Legal Opinion
Holland v. C. & A. IMPORT CORPORATION
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs attempted to import into this country a shipment of Italian wine bearing the label “It Is It Is It Is.” The shipment was detained by the collector of the port, at the'instanee of the defendant C. & A. Import Corporation, on the ground that the label was merely a translation of the latter’s registered trade-mark “Est Est Est” and infringed it. The plaintiffs then brought this suit to restrain the collector from interference and to cancel the registered trade-mark as invalid. In the suit the plaintiffs moved for preliminary relief, asking that both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Le Blume Import Co. v. CotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Dadirrian v. YacubianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Italian Swiss Colony v. Italian Vineyard Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Burke v. CassinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Otokoyama Co. v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Enrique Bernat F., S.A. v. Guadalajara, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Weiss Noodle Company v. Golden Cracknel and Specialty CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Donald F. Duncan, Inc. v. Royal Tops Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Randy BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.