Legal Opinion
Le Blume Import Co. v. Coty
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 18, 1923No. Nos. 288, 289PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above),. The -question raised by these cases makes it necessary to determine whether the Coty trade-mark was capable of registration in the Patent Office of the United States. If it was not entitled to registration, the plaintiff in the first of these two suits was entitled to the relief it sought. On Ihe other hand, if the trade-mark was entitled to registration, the plaintiff in the second suit was entitled to the injunction which it obtained, and error was not committed in either suit.
In both suits counsel moved for temporary injunctions. In the first suit no…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.