Legal Opinion

Dadirrian v. Yacubian

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 3, 1900No. 287PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

We assent to the decree entered in this case by the circuit court, and to the principles of law stated in the opinion of the learned judge who sat in that court (90 Fed. 812); but, apparently, certain phases of the facts have been urged upon us more strenuously than they were urged below, so that we find it necessary to give expression to our views about them.

The trade-mark of the complainant below (now the appellant) was registered by virtue of an application tiled on August 7, 1885, under the act of March 3, 1881. (21 Stat. 502). The application is given at length in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Church v. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
  4. Centaur Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Dadirrian v. YacubianU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Le Blume Import Co. v. CotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Weiss Noodle Company v. Golden Cracknel and Specialty CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Donald F. Duncan, Inc. v. Royal Tops Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Randy BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  4. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Coty, Inc. v. Le Blume Import Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API