Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Rizzo
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 5, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-258PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on petitioners’ motion for leave to intervene pursuant to Rules 24(a)' and 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The petitioners are the Fire Officers Union of the City of Philadelphia and individual firemen and officers in the Philadelphia Fire Department who have taken and passed the required examination for promotions within the Fire Department. Because the motion for leave to intervene was not timely filed within the meaning of Rule 24, it will be denied.
An understanding of the factual backdrop against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Blue Chip Stamp CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
- Hoots v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Officers for Justice v. Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Jefferson Bank v. Devault Manufacturing Co. (In Re Devault Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jenner v. Real Estate ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Payne v. Tri-State Careflight, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- United States v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.