Legal Opinion
Claridge v. New Hampshire Wetlands Board
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 1984No. 83-520PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The plaintiffs, John and Winifred Claridge, appeal a superior court ruling that the New Hampshire Wetlands Board’s denial of a permit to place fill on their property in Rye does not constitute a compensable taking of property. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.
In 1979, the Claridges applied for a fill permit from the wetlands board. After a hearing, the application was denied. The Claridges *747appealed to the superior court in accordance with RSA 483-A:4. The court referred the matter to a Master (R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.), who took testimony and viewed the property. The master’s findings and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Quirk v. Town of New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Rowe v. Town of North HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Alexander v. Town of HampsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.