Legal Opinion

Nash v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 4, 1974PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

These actions arose out of an automobile collision at a highway intersection in the town of Winchester. The cases were tried together to a jury and, by stipulation, they were consolidated for appeal. Practice Book § 606. The collision occurred between a 1964 Pontiac sedan owned and operated by the defendant, G-eorge Hoxie, in which the plaintiff, Edward H. Nash, Jr., was a passenger, and a 1934 Plymouth sedan operated by the defendant Carl Hunt and owned by the defendant Vincent G-. Hunt. The plaintiff Nash brought suit against both the defendant Hoxie and the defendants Hunt, alleging in his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. MullingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Bruneau v. QuickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Reilly v. DiBiancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API