Legal Opinion
State v. Mullings
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 16, 1974PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
After a trial by jury, the defendant, David Mullings, was found guilty of selling heroin in violation of § 19-480 (a) of the General Statutes. The defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict was denied by the trial court and from the judgment rendered thereon he has appealed to this court.
The first of several assignments of error pursued by the defendant in his brief is that the court erred in failing to grant his motion to set aside the verdict of guilty because it is not supported by the evidence. In his brief, the defendant appears to limit his contention to the claim that the death of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- State v. MarianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.