Legal Opinion
In Re Verburg & Wesco, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 4, 1992No. 91-196PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Petitioners, Wesco, Inc. and Jacob and Harmke Verburg, appeal from a declaratory ruling by the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation. That ruling makes it impossible for Wesco to build a gas station and convenience store on two lots owned by the Verburgs because the land lies in a flood plain. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The two lots lie at the Richmond exit of Interstate 89 and were subdivided by the Verburgs under a deferral of permit issued by the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). The deferral requires that, for the lots in question, a permit be obtained before…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Rogers v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Grenafege v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- In Re R.S. Audley, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re Williston Inn GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- R&G Properties, Inc. v. Column Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Appeals of ANR Permits in Lowell Mountain Wind ProjectSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Bedini v. FrostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.