Legal Opinion

Taylor v. City of Crawfordsville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1900No. 19,149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— This is an action by appellant to restrain the appellee from proceeding with the improvement of a part of Plum street, recently opened through her land.

The complaint, being in a single paragraph, among other things, in substance avers that the plaintiff was the owner of real estate in the city of Crawfordsville eighty-two and one-half feet in width fronting on Wabash avenue and 370 feet deep; that in 1899 the city extended and opened Plum street from Wabash avenue to Main street and in so doing *404passed over and appropriated for the purpose of said street a strip fifty'feet in width and 370…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Caskey v. City of GreensburghIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Martin v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Board of Commissioners v. DickinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McKee v. Town of PendletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martindale v. Town of RochesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Deane v. Indiana Macadam & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Martin v. WillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Boyd v. Logansport, Rochester & Northern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Michigan City Car Co. v. EstfamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API