Legal Opinion

Michigan City Car Co. v. Estfam

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1920No. 10,376Published

From Laporte Superior Court; Hurry L. Crumpacker, Judge. Action by the Michigan City Car Company against George Estfam. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

This was an action by appellant against appellee to enjoin the prosecution of an action by appellee against appellant for damages in the Laporte Superior Court.

The complaint in substance avers that, in September, 1914, appellee was in the employ of appellant, working in its car factory at Michigan City. While so employed, appellee was engaged in swinging a sledge hammer, when he was injured in the eye. The parties afterward engaged in negotiating over the matter, appellee claiming damages, and appellant claiming no liability. The negotiations resulted in the execution by the parties of an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. DickinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Palmer v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hartman v. HeadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Taylor v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Martin v. OrrIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API