Legal Opinion

Preblich v. Zorea

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. S-8635PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Evalyn Preblich appeals from the summary dismissal of her attorney malpractice action against Moshe Zorea. The superior court granted summary judgment because the statute of limitations had run. Because we conclude that Preblich had sufficient information to alert her that she had a cause of action more than six years before she filed suit, we affirm.

II. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS 1

Preblich retained Zorea in October 1987 to represent her in a bankruptcy proceeding. After a 1988 conversion of Preblich’s case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Greywolf v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API