Legal Opinion

Pollard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1982No. 43647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Richard Lee Pollard appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. Pollard’s contentions in this post-conviction proceeding center on the procedures used to identify him in his trial for first degree robbery. We affirm.

Pollard was convicted on November 30, 1966 and sentenced to twenty-five years in the Missouri Division of Corrections. Pollard’s appeal raised these same identification issues. The judgment was affirmed in State v. Pollard, 425 S.W.2d 106 (Mo.1968).

A post-conviction proceeding under Rule 27.26 cannot function as a substitute for a second appeal. It is a forum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilhite v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Wolfe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Wing v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReasonoverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Armbruster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Daniels v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API