Legal Opinion

Wilhite v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1981No. 11990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Tommy Wayne Wilhite filed a postconviction motion under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., seeking relief from a sentence for felonious stealing.1 He alleged his trial attorney was derelict in numerous respects and, consequently, he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.

Appellant’s motion averred his lawyer failed to discover the state’s “deal” with witness Walk and any criminal record of Walk; failed to discover that other stolen items were possessed by John Warren and failed to subpoena Warren; failed to object to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Charles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Decker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Reeves v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Jennings v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Kern v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API