Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Antonio Torres-Hernandez, A.K.A. Roberto Martinez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2006No. 05-50136PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge.

Today we decide a district court need not and may not take into account Hispanics who are ineligible for jury service to determine whether Hispanics are underrepresented on grand jury venires. To establish a prima facie violation of the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee that grand juries reflect a fair cross-section of the community, a defendant must prove in part “that the representation of [an allegedly underrepresented] group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community.” Duren v. Missouri, 439…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Peter Leroy VealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Gros Ventre Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Salvador Hernandez-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Gros Ventre Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Timothy Scott Weeks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API