United States v. Salvador Hernandez-Estrada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
The Sixth Amendment and the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968 (“the Jury Selection Act”) afford criminal defendants “the right to be tried by an impartial jury drawn from sources reflecting a fair cross section of the community.” Berghuis v. Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 319, 130 S.Ct. 1382, 176 L.Ed.2d 249 (2010). Our circuit precedent required courts to evaluate challenges to the fair cross-section requirement using the “absolute disparity” test. United States v. Rodriguez-Lara, 421 F.3d 932, 943 (9th Cir.2005). On re-examining the question, we conclude that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State of Iowa v. Peter Leroy VealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State of Iowa v. Kenneth L. LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Cabalce v. Thomas E. Blanchard & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.