Legal Opinion

California ex rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. U.S. Department of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2014No. Nos. 12-55856, 12-55956PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed May 19, 2014, and published at 751 F.3d 1113, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 32, in the fourth and fifth textual sentences in the second full paragraph,

Change: “Imperial Irrigation, Imperial County, and the State of California, not the Secretary, will ultimately determine how to allocate the water they receive. If they so choose, they could allocate every acre foot of their Colorado River water to the Saltón Sea.”

To: “Imperial Irrigation, not the Secretary, ultimately controls the allocation of the water that it receives (subject, of course, to existing laws…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Stephanie Daniel v. National Park ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Friends of the Santa Clara v. US Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Ctr for Biological Diversity v. Ashton CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Michiko Gingery v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API