Legal Opinion

Stephanie Daniel v. National Park Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 2018No. 16-35689PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHANIE DANIEL, on behalf of No. 16-35689 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:16-cv-00018- SPW v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; DOES, 1– OPINION 10, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 5, 2017 Seattle, Washington Filed May 30, 2018 Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, M. Margaret McKeown, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge McKeown 2 DANIEL V. NAT’L…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Anthony Robinson v. US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. Bobby Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  4. Klint L. Mowrer v. DOTCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  5. Robinson v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API