Smith v. Dorn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, 0.
— The Southern California Motor Road Company is a corporation organized in this state, which, on April 15, 1890, owned a railroad leading from the ' city of San Bernardino to the city of Riverside, in the county of San Bernardino, in this state, with equipments and other real and personal property.
At a specially called meeting of its directors, held on the fifteenth day of April, 1890, it was resolved to sell the road and equipments, with all other property of the corporation, to the defendant D. S. Dorn; and accordingly, on the same day, a deed was executed to Dorn, purporting to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Ashton v. Dashaway Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reilly v. OglebayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Alta Silver Mining Co. v. Alta Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Canadian Bank of Commerce v. LealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.