Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Procter & Gamble

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1991No. Docket 118475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.

A. F. Bouchard & Son Greenhouse and the Accident Fund of Michigan appeal by leave granted from an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirming with modification the decision of a hearing referee awarding benefits to plaintiff Alexander G. Maxwell. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

i

On July 31, 1967, while working for Bouchard, plaintiff suffered an injury to his lower left leg while operating a Rototiller. The injury resulted in the amputation of plaintiff’s left leg three inches below the knee. Plaintiff did not work for six or seven weeks, then returned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Powell v. Casco Nelmor Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sanford v. Ryerson & Haynes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Staggs v. Genesee District LibraryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Daniel v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Eaton v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Daniel v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Daniel v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API