Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Ryerson & Haynes, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1976No. 56200, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.

(to reverse). There is a single issue in this case: Was the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board’s (WCAB) determination of plaintiffs disability supported by any competent evidence? We hold that it was.

Plaintiff commenced employment with defendant in 1959, and worked steadily for the company from 1961 until the date of this injury, June 30, 1969.

At the time of this injury, plaintiff was employed as a lift truck driver, and had been so employed for three years. Plaintiff described his work as follows:

"Well, it’s a big turntable. I’ve got to be a turning that, you know, and then them big wooden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hollingsworth v. Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Johnson v. Northwestern Veneer & Plywood Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lyczynski v. Mohawk Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kosiel v. Arrow Liquors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Nezdropa v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. McDonald v. MEIJER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API