Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1994No. Docket No. 139552PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which modified a referee’s finding of total disability to partial disability and, on that basis, denied supplemental benefits. The Attorney General joins plaintiff, appealing on behalf of the Compensation Supplement Fund. We reverse and remand for computation of benefits.

Plaintiff was born October 10, 1921. During the 1940s, plaintiff was a professional boxer for five or *479six years, but quit after his hands became "brittle.” Thereafter, he held various jobs while helping to train other boxers.

Plaintiff began working for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hood v. Wyandotte Oil & Fat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Pulley v. Detroit Engineering & MacHine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kosiel v. Arrow Liquors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kosiel v. Arrow Liquors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API