Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1971No. State 29PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first issue presented on this appeal is whether the complaint is sufficient on both counts. In order to reach this issue we must first determine whether, as the state contends, defendant waived his objections to the sufficiency of the complaint. We think not.

Defendant was arraigned before Judge Farnum at 5:50 p. m. on the day of his arrest. At this proceeding the complaint was read to defendant, and the record notes that defendant had been given a written copy thereof. Defendant then entered an objection “to the form of the complaint and the substance of the complaint,” citing Massen v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of West Allis v. DieringerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Allen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Radloff v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ElsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Elkhorn Area School District v. East Troy Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Opinion No. Oag 41-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
  4. (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
  5. Opinion No. Oag 113-79, (1979), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API