Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. City of West Allis v. Dieringer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The principal question presented is whether the trial court correctly interpreted the term “territory affected” as it appears in sec. 40.06 (2), Stats. 1955.
The legislature has provided two methods for the organization, reorganization, or dissolution of school districts in this state. Under sec. 40.03, Stats., authority is vested in the school committee to create, alter, consolidate, or dissolve school districts. Under sec. 40.06, such power is invested in town boards or village boards of councils of cities of the second, third, or fourth class. Joint City School District No. 1 referred to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Harrington v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- State ex rel. Bashford v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Wright v. ForrestalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Aero Auto Parts, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Milwaukee v. LindnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.