Legal Opinion
In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litig.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 10, 2017No. Case No. 17–MD–02773–LHKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Sarah Key, Andrew Westley, Terese Russell, and Carra Abernathy (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring a putative class action against Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm"). Before the Court is Qualcomm's motion to dismiss and/or strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint ("CCAC"). ECF No. 110 ("Mot."). Having considered the parties' submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss and/or strike.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
This case…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Key v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Focus 15, LLC v. NICO CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Yuki Kobayashi v. Morgan McMullinDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022