Legal Opinion
Whipple v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1942No. Civil No. 4399PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
— Claude E. Webb, petitioner, received an award of compensation, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1939, § 56-901 et seq., against Joseph E. Whipple, and/or Whipple & Brady, and/or The Joseph E. Whipple Lumber Company, Incorporated, respondents, for an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Eespondents asked for a rehearing on the award, which was denied, and the matter is brought before us in the usual manner.
It is not seriously questioned that petitioner was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, but it is most strenuously…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Phoenix Safety Investment Co. v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Walker v. Southwest Mines Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation v. LuntArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Chapman v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Elson Development Co. v. Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Ferrarell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.