Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Bliss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1927No. 25303PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This is. an appeal by David W. Bliss and Gustave A. Schlueter from a final order of the trial court refusing them a judgment against Fred Braun for. a deficiency remaining due them on the findings and decree of foreclos*306ure of a real estate mortgage after the distribution of the proceeds of the sale.

The record brought before us begins with the answer and cross-petition of Bliss and Schlueter filed in the main suit on July 16, 1923, in which they set up a second mortgage in suit against defendants other than Braun, plead a written contract for a valuable consideration between those other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. FossNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rockwell v. Blair Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Reynolds v. DietzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. SaathoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Parratt v. HartsuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbus Land, Loan & Building Ass'n v. WolkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Twin Towers Condo. Assn. v. Bel Fury Invest. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Arnold v. HawleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Parker v. BourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. First Trust Co. v. Eastridge ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API