Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Insurance v. Saathoff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1927No. 24766PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal taken by defendant Eno Saathoff from the refusal of the district court for Boone county to allow a deficiency judgment. The record reflects the following: Both the plaintiff and defendant, cross-petitioner Eno Saathoff, were seeking to foreclose their respective mortgages on the lands in question, and praying for a deficiency judgment; Eno Saathoff against the defendants Pieper, appellees herein. After due service of summons on all parties, the Piepers failed to plead and default was entered against them. The issues being duly joined, trial was had, and the court found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Island Banking Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ward v. UrmsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Parratt v. HartsuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kloke v. GardelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Anderson v. WalshNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Columbus Land, Loan & Building Ass'n v. WolkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sloan v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Twin Towers Condo. Assn. v. Bel Fury Invest. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Glissmann v. OrchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Arnold v. HawleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API