Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Hawley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1935No. 29244PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

In a mortgage foreclosure action, after decree, expiration of stay, sale of the mortgaged premises and confirmation thereof, a deficiency judgment was entered against the defendants. From the entry of the latter judgment, defendants have appealed.

Defendants contend that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment in the foreclosure action, and base this contention upon section 20-2141, Comp. St. Supp. 1933, which reads: “When a petition shall be filed for the satisfaction of a mortgage, the court shall have the power only to decree and conv pel the delivery of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WestNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Union Central Life Insurance v. SaathoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Parratt v. HartsuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Patrick v. National Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ritchey v. SeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Grand Island v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Todd v. WinkelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Columbus Land, Loan & Building Ass'n v. WolkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Parker v. BourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. First Trust Co. v. Eastridge ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API