Arnold v. Hawley
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
In a mortgage foreclosure action, after decree, expiration of stay, sale of the mortgaged premises and confirmation thereof, a deficiency judgment was entered against the defendants. From the entry of the latter judgment, defendants have appealed.
Defendants contend that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment in the foreclosure action, and base this contention upon section 20-2141, Comp. St. Supp. 1933, which reads: “When a petition shall be filed for the satisfaction of a mortgage, the court shall have the power only to decree and conv pel the delivery of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. WestNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Union Central Life Insurance v. SaathoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Parratt v. HartsuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Patrick v. National Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Ritchey v. SeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Grand Island v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Todd v. WinkelmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Columbus Land, Loan & Building Ass'n v. WolkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Parker v. BourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- First Trust Co. v. Eastridge ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.