Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Adorno

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 21, 2011No. SC09-1012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Both Henry Nissim Adorno and The Florida Bar petition this Court for review of the referee’s report finding Adorno guilty of ethical breaches and recommending a public reprimand. Adorno takes issue with the findings of guilt, and the Bar takes issue with the leniency of the punishment.1 We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

As the number of lawyers increases to an unprecedented level, the responsibility of ensuring that all lawyers conduct themselves within the ethical bounds required by the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar continues to be a top priority for this Court. This case…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Beach v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jon Douglas ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Gratchev v. GratchevDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  3. In re Discipline of AdornoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. The Florida Bar v. Brian P. RushSupreme Court of Florida · 2023
  5. The Florida Bar v. Peter G. HermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API