Rosewitz v. Latting
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal primarily concerns the procedural due process rights of a city employee. Appellant, Pauline Rosewitz, was terminated from her employment as a mail clerk in the City Treasurer’s office by notice received July 12, 1973, effective that day. The City provided nonprobationary employees such as Ms. Rosewitz with a five-step grievance procedure1 for challenging terminations. Ms. Rosewitz waived the first two steps, and her termination was upheld at the third, fourth and fifth steps. In this § 19832 suit, Ms. Rosewitz challenges the grievance procedure as defective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Yolanda Fuentes Riggins v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, a Public Body Corporate John Dzerk, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Bailey v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Razatos v. Colorado Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Boston v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.