Legal Opinion

Rosewitz v. Latting

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1982No. Nos. 80-2253, 80-2258PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal primarily concerns the procedural due process rights of a city employee. Appellant, Pauline Rosewitz, was terminated from her employment as a mail clerk in the City Treasurer’s office by notice received July 12, 1973, effective that day. The City provided nonprobationary employees such as Ms. Rosewitz with a five-step grievance procedure1 for challenging terminations. Ms. Rosewitz waived the first two steps, and her termination was upheld at the third, fourth and fifth steps. In this § 19832 suit, Ms. Rosewitz challenges the grievance procedure as defective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yolanda Fuentes Riggins v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, a Public Body Corporate John Dzerk, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Bailey v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Razatos v. Colorado Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Boston v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API