Legal Opinion

Liggett v. Hinkley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1889No. 13,741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action by Mary Hinkley against Jane Liggett and James W. Liggett to set aside a ■conveyance of certain real estate, and to subject the land to the lien of a judgment theretofore recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant Jane Liggett.

It is averred in the complaint that Jane Liggett paid the purchase-price of the land out of her own means, and that she caused the conveyance to be taken in the name of her son, James W., who paid no part of the consideration, and that this was done with the fraudulent intent, participated in by both the vendor and vendee, to cheat, hinder, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Voss v. EllerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Williams v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Benner v. BennerIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Kreitline v. FranzIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Shular v. ShularIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Miller v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Atkinson v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Studabaker v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API