Legal Opinion
Saverson v. Levitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 95-0890 (CRR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-entitled case is the Plaintiffs Motion to Revise the Court’s June 14,1995 Scheduling Order. Upon careful consideration of the Plaintiffs Motion, the entire record herein, and the law applicable thereto, the Court shall DENY the Plaintiffs Motion.
The Court’s Scheduling Order directs that
in preparation for trial and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a), and Local Rule 209, counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall prepare all of the direct testimony of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In Re Richard J. Adair Marty S. Adair, Debtors. Richard J. Adair Marty S. Adair v. Sunwest Bank Guardian Trust Deed ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Phonetele, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ronnie A. TRAYLOR and Ann M. Traylor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUSQVARNA MOTOR, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fasa Corp. v. Playmates Toys, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Kuntz v. Sea Eagle Diving Adventures Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
- Brooks v. RosebarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2023