Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Rosebar
United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2023No. 20-10011Unknown
1Opinion
order below is hereby signed. SO March 29 2023 aed ally Oy, CT oF □□ ee fF i hit a oS Lligabeth | . Ku 1 (US. Bankruptey Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA David Brooks, Plaintiff, Adv. Pro. 20-10011-ELG Vv. Erin Michelle Rosebar, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION Before the Court is the fully briefed Motion for Reconsideration (the “Motion for Reconsideration”)! filed by defendant Erin Michelle Rosebar (the “Defendant” that asks the Court to reconsider the Memorandum Decision RE [sic] Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment '…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.