Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Gallagher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action of tort. The declaration is in two counts. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the case is here on the defendant’s exceptions. The questions for review arise under the first count, by which recovery is sought for the conversion of 10 shares of the capital stock of the Hardwick Savings Bank & Trust Company.

The defendant moved for a directed verdict on this count. The motion was denied, and he excepted. Taken in the light most favorable for the plaintiff, the evidence tended to show the following facts: Both plaintiff and defendant were directors of the Hardwick Savings…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Jenness v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  4. American Pig Iron Storage Warrant Co. v. GermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Carrigan v. Lycoming Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Island Pond National Bank v. LacroixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Ligon v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. MorlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Vermont Evaporator Co. v. TaftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  5. Town of Troy v. AMERICAN FIDELTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API