Legal Opinion

Moran v. Bentley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 13, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for an accounting and for damages, brought to the Superior Court in New London County and reserved by that court, Robinson, J., upon a finding of facts, for the consideration and advice of this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.

In this case the plaintiffs, claiming to be the surviving members of a copartnership called The New London Lumber Company, alleged to have consisted of themselves and one Andrew J. Bentley now deceased, seek by way of equitable relief against the administratrix of Bentley, an adjustment of the copartnership accounts, and an accounting by the defendant for the property and effects of said copartnership received and possessed, as it is alleged, by Bentley, during his lifetime. Upon the pleadings and the finding of facts made by the trial court the case was reserved for the advice of this court.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Greenthal v. Lincoln, Seyms & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. Bennett v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Buol MacHine Co. v. BUCKENESSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Berman v. KlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Moran v. BentleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API