Legal Opinion

Harvey v. . Linker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The plaintiffs concede that a contract for the sale of land must be in writing and signed by the party or parties to be charged therewith. But they insist the court erred in granting defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit herein, and cite in support of their contention the cases of Allston v. Connell, 140 N. C., 485, 53 S. E., 292, and Johnson v. Noles, 224 N. C., 542, 31 S. E. (2d), 637. Both cases relate solely to the extension of the time for performance under the terms of the contract; and the extensions were requested before the expiration of the options and at the request and for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Burriss v. . StarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Alston v. . ConnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. McCall v. Textile Industrial InstituteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Keith v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Fletcher v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Shepherd v. Duke Power Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
  5. Fletcher v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API