Legal Opinion

Keith v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

All contracts to sell or convey lands, or any interest in or concerning them, shall be void unless said contract, or some memorandum or note thereof, be put in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some other person by him thereto lawfully authorized. C. S., 988.

The defendant, who is the party to be charged (Hall v. Misenheimer, 137 N. C., 184), contends that he signed no memorandum or note in contemplation of the statute; that the contract to which the-plaintiff testified at the trial was not reduced to writing; that he was under no legal obligation to purchase the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayer v. . AdrianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Burriss v. . StarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Smith v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Kent v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API