In re P.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Respondent mother appeals from an order of the trial court adjudicating her son P.M. to be neglected and dependent. We hold that the trial court’s findings of fact support its conclusion that P.M. is neglected, but that they are insufficient to establish dependency because the court failed to address the availability of appropriate alternative childcare arrangements. We, therefore, affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
In a non-jury adjudication of abuse, neglect, and dependency, “the trial court’s findings of fact supported by clear and convincing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In re E.N.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In re N.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re E.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- In re B.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re M.D., N.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re A.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.