Legal Opinion

Baker v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1990No. CX-90-346PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondent Mary Baker (Baker) brought this action on behalf of respondent Timothy Michael Baker, seeking survivor’s economic loss benefits and funeral benefits through the Minnesota Assigned Claims Bureau as a result of the death of Timothy’s mother. Appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), to whom the claim was assigned, denied recovery arguing that the death of Tamera Baker did not arise out of the maintenance or use of a. motor vehicle and that the assigned claims plan does not cover deaths occurring outside of Minnesota. The trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dahle v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Mohs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. J.R.B. v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API