Legal Opinion

Salcedo-Albanez v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 23, 2001No. 3:00-cv-01999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

WHELAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elisa Salcedo-Albanez (“Plaintiff’) moves to amend pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant the United States of America (“United States”) opposes. All parties are represented by counsel. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to CM Local Rule 7.1(d.l).

I. Background

On October 11, 1998 Plaintiff was involved in a car accident with a United States Border Patrol vehicle on Highway SR-98. (See Pi’s Compl. at 2.) Sometime thereafter, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Hutchinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
  2. Gallucci v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  3. Lo v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  4. Petker v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Warren v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API