Legal Opinion
Lo v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 4, 2022No. 2:17-cv-01202Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 KA WAI JIMMY LO, CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01202-TL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. AMENDED MOTION TO AMEND THE CLAIM AMOUNT 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Amend the Claim 17 Amount (the “Amended Motion”). Dkt. No. 94. The United States (the “Government”) opposes 18 the Amended Motion. Dkt. No. 97. Having reviewed the relevant record and having found this 19 matter suitable for decision without oral argument, see…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Freddie L. Johnson and Clara Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Cross v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Timothy B. Hay, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Low v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Vincent William Michels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Michels v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.