Bogardus v. O'Dea
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURNELL, J., pro tem.
The appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll, which discloses the record to be as follows: The original complaint named as defendants H. S. McLaughlin and H. Sydney McLaughlin in addition to O ’Dea, who is the respondent here. It is alleged that in June, 1924, O ’Dea, through his attorney H. S. McLaughlin, had filed a complaint seeking recovery of money claimed to be due on the rental of certain real property; that the return on the summons showed personal service thereof by H. Sidney McLaughlin and that thereafter judgment by default was entered against the appellant on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Bee v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Charleville v. Metropolitan Trust Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Jenkins v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.