Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided November 9, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill to enjoin the infringement of a patent for a process of making aluminum by electrolysis, and to re*126cover damages. Tlie case Ras been Reax-d or its merits, and a. decree rendered sustaining tbe patent, finding that tbe defendant bas infringed it, and referring to a special master tbe question of damages. The opinion of tbe court is reported in 55 Fed. 301. A motion is now made by tbe defendant to reopen tbe case, for leave to introduce new evidence, and for a rebearing. Tbe opinion on tbe merits was filed on January 20, 1803, and a decree entered in accordance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. WhitingUnited States Circuit Court · 1840
  2. Purcell v. MinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
  4. City of Omaha v. RedickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  5. Ruggles v. EddyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Interests in Property in Monterey CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
  2. Flint & P. M. R. Co. v. Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895
  3. Panzl v. Battle Island Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  4. Cashvan v. DarlingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  5. Sheeler v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API