Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

John Kromrey had worked for Niebuhr & Son for about fifteen years, handling produce in a warehouse. On August 18, 1928, the business was in the hands of Peder-son and Voechting as trustees. On the afternoon of that day the trustees advised Kromrey that his services would not be needed thereafter. He quit work at six o’clock. In the evening, in response to a telephone call, he went to Pederson’s office, which was independent of and some distance from the building where Kromrey had worked. He gave Pederson the keys. He was not paid at the time, as Voechting, who was required to join with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hackley-Phelps-Bonnell Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Johnson v. City of AlbiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Mitchell v. Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Solo Cup Company v. PateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Gunthrop-Warren Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mitchell v. Ed HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Secor v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Nails v. Market Tire Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API