Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Consolidated Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The statement in this ease may be materially abbreviated by quoting at the outset the statement of counsel for appellant, that the sole and “only question in dispute is whether or not the relation of employer and employee existed between the defendant company and the deceased.” It is not denied that deceased had been employed in the defendant’s mine, but it is insisted that, at the time of his injury, he had been discharged from the service, and that the relation of employer and employee, as contemplated by the statute, was completely terminated. The injury was received by the deceased while…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. O'Neill v. Sioux City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Jackson v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StoutSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Parrott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. W. B. Davis Son v. RupleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Johnson v. City of AlbiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API