H. S. Richardson Coal Co. v. Cermak
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John K. Prindiville, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question presented on the record is one of law, whether what is known as the Bulk Sales Act of 1913 (Hurd’s B. S. 1913, p. 906, ch. 38a, |[|[ 4, 5,) applies to a sale of a double team of horses, including harness and wagon, which the vendor had been personally using to haul coal for others at a compensation of so much per ton.
The case was a replevin' suit, tried before the court without a jury, and the court refused to hold as law a proposition submitted by plaintiff to the effect that said act does not apply to such a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. BelooskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Larson v. JuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- Ogden Avenue State Bank v. CherryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Athon v. McAllisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
- La Salle Opera House Co. ex rel. Goes Lithographing Co. v. La Salle Amusement Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
- Gaspee Cab Co. v. McGovernSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1930