Legal Opinion

G. S. Johnson Co. v. Beloosky

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1914PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. Benjamin S. Bell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

Ernest Pilatt was engaged in the bakery business and used in connection therewith a delivery wagon and a team of horses. He made a bill of sale covering his. entire stock in trade, store fixtures and the wagon and team used in connection with the business, to Rossie Beloosky. Subsequently the G. S. Johnson Company, being a creditor of Pilatt, levied an attachment upon the goods and chattels sold to appellee, basing the attachment upon the failure to comply with an act of the legislature known as the Bulk Sales act of 1913. It is admitted that no attempt was made to comply with the act in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charges J. Off & Co. v. MoreheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pogue v. RoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Klein v. . MaravelasNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Landers Frary & Clark v. Vischer Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. Coon v. DossIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API